🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a British mosque. There should be widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you probably can't draw the line at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that protests opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have taken many thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing Palestine Action, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for carrying placards against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to slip away.